Tell her what you've done
Ten minutes on Telegram. What you built, what you're good at, what you'd take and what you'd refuse. She asks the follow-ups a good mentor would.
Stop applying. Get asked.
Ten minutes on Telegram. Then the roles come to you.
The employers are already here.
Hiring teams across Singapore brief Donna directly on the roles they need filled, every week. The day your profile exists you are considered for every brief that fits you — and you stay considered, month after month, without ever opening a job board again.
You don't go looking. The curated openings simply keep arriving.
One conversation, then nothing.
No dashboard to keep up to date, no profile to keep polishing, no applications to send. You talk to her once and she works from then on.
She keeps it alive
Everything you said, structured and current. New project, new grade, changed your mind about consulting? Send her a message and it updates.
Roles arrive
When a company briefs her, she checks who genuinely fits and asks you privately. One tap: yes or no. You never write an application again.
She makes the introduction
Only after your yes does anyone see you, and they arrive already knowing your work. Donna handles the intro and stays with you through what follows.
Here's what I have. Correct me any time.
Your profile live
Real work
Built a payments reconciliation engine alone. Ops time down 31%.Strong at
Payments infra, messy data. Not frontend.Wants
Team under 15, owns a surface. $4.5k over $6.5k for it.Won't do
Banks. Crypto.You weren't looking. Read this one anyway.
Founding Engineer, Payments
- They need real reconciliation experience
- Team of 11, you said under 15
- They'll work around your FYP, I asked
Interested
Not for me
Interested
Done. They're getting the recon work, the 31%, and your FYP timing.
Introduction sent.
You and Wei Lin, CTO at Ledgerline. She's read your context, not a CV.
You and Wei Lin, CTO at Ledgerline. She's read your context, not a CV.
Everything a CV throws away.
One page, written to survive a filter. Put the two side by side and it's obvious which one a hiring manager should have been reading.
Your CV PDF
- NUS, Computer Science, Year 3
- GPA 4.21 / 5.00
- Software Engineering Intern, a fintech
- “Worked on backend systems in an agile environment”
- Python, React, SQL, Git
- Interests: hiking, photography
What Donna tells them Live
The work that isn't on the page
Wrote the matching engine for a payments reconciliation tool, alone, in eight weeks. Cut ops time 31%.
Where they're genuinely strong, and where they aren't
Payments infrastructure and ugly data. Not a frontend engineer, and says so before being asked.
What would actually move them
Owning one surface end to end on a team under fifteen. Would take $4.5k over $6.5k for that.
Hard limits
Would relocate to Jakarta or HCMC. Never a bank. Never crypto.
Timing worth planning around
Free from May, needs eight lighter weeks at FYP submission.
Identical to four thousand other PDFs
Updated nine days ago, by text
Nobody sees you until you say so.
There is no public profile and no “open to work” badge. Donna holds your context privately and asks you before every single introduction.
Let Donna match me to roles
She checks fit quietly and only messages you when it's real.
Hide me from specific companies
Blocklist your employer or anyone else. They never see you surface.
Share salary expectations up front
Off by default. Turn it on to filter out lowball intros early.
Questions worth asking.
I'm in Year 2 with one small internship. Is this for me?
Especially. The thinner your CV looks on paper, the more you gain from something that can explain what you actually did. Uni, poly or bootcamp, it doesn't matter, as long as you can talk about work you've done.
Will my school or current company find out?
No. Nothing is public and nothing reaches a company until you approve that specific introduction. You can blocklist any employer outright, and they will never see you surface, even on a perfect match.
Does it cost anything?
Never for candidates. Companies pay to hire, which is exactly why Donna works for you instead of for whoever is paying to message you.
How is this different from LinkedIn?
LinkedIn made you searchable by keyword, so it rewards people who write good keywords rather than people who do good work. Donna talks to you and ends up holding the things a profile has no field for: what you'd move city for, what you'd take a pay cut for, the project you never wrote up.
What does she actually ask?
What you've built and how. Where you're strong and where you're not. What you earn now and what you want next. Whether you'd relocate, and for how much. What kind of team suits you. What you'd turn down flat. Roughly the conversation you'd have with a senior you trust.
What if I'm not looking right now?
That's the point. The best roles arrive when you weren't searching. Donna keeps your context current so that when something genuinely worth leaving for appears, you hear about it instead of reading about the hire six months later.
Can an AI really represent me properly?
She represents what you told her, in your words, and asks before using any of it. You can read everything she holds at any time and correct her by message. If she gets something wrong, you say so and it changes.
Ten minutes now. Asked for years.
Summer recruiting is decided long before the postings appear. Talk to Donna once and you are in the room for all of it.